Re: python-bibtex Documentation?

Frederic Gobry <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.apps.pybliographer
Message-ID <20040525153820.GA15954@rhin>
> I'm thinking about a KDE version of pybliographic... It would just
> safe a lot of time and work to use a ready and stable python-bibtex
> binding.

Maybe I don't remember perfectly, but the whole BibTeX handling should
be hidden behind the Format/Bibtex.py module, so, for a port of the
GUI, you would not need a full documentation of the C module. Feel
free to ask for specific question, the key point is that I will
probably have more responsiveness to specific inquiries than to a
global documentation effort.

Regarding the fact of saving time, the code of pyblio 1.3, even if not
mature on many respects, intends to better factorize the code between
the possible front-ends. However, it would be a good idea to validate
it as soon as possible (code is reusable only when it has been reused
:-)) So it depends on your objective : having a port of 1.2, maybe
earlier, but not be part of the current developments, or having sth
cleaner on 1.3...

Whatever you decide, I'm interested to know how things progress, and I
think other people on the mailing list would be.

Frédéric
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAs2hsFjQHpltE9KURAhtpAKCp3oWCeJHfxpFopCzIGI68PWHqagCgq48w
eeaY+qRKvRU8PQ43QZynljQ=
=gvIo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.