Re: User Interface proposals

Sriram Ramkrishna <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.apps.rhythmbox.devel
Message-ID <CADWtFEnzw2BGwMkgaCRGXJhMFrDepUbCobBWXZgvLLjBAhWeEg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Ronan Jouchet <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello Rhythmboxers,
>
> I just switched to RB 2.95 and love it, but I was disappointed to see the
> UI remained largely unchanged since 0.x. Then, one line of the NEWS file
> intrigued me: "First steps in redesigning some parts of the UI that sorely
> need it".
>
> Which made me think that now could be a good moment to make a few UI
> proposals, since there seem to be some momentum. I summed up these
> proposals in a wiki page:
> https://live.gnome.org/Rhythmbox/UserInterfaceReworkProposals
>

Thank you for doing this.  It's a very nice detailed analysis and I
appreciate it.  A couple of things:

1)  It would be best to get Jonathan's take on the UI.  Without the
maintainer involved it will be hard to get a lot of the changes.  I would
prefer to see understand where RB is going to go from his perspective as is
proper.  He may or may not have a roadmap on the UI.

2) Secondly, UI design should go through #gnome-design on IRC if we want to
make it into a proper GNOME 3 app that fits with the GNOME 3 design.

Also check the http://live.gnome.org/Design/Apps/Music which has some
designs already on a music player.  The problem with that design is that it
seems to be applicable to a collection of files in a directory eg ~/Music.
I'm not quite big on that as $HOME tends to grow quite big and being able
to use a separate partition that could possibly on a shared disk might be a
better idea.

sri


> I guess some of these proposals were already discussed, and maybe a few of
> them have entries in Bugzilla. That's OK, feel free to edit the page (or
> point me here to the discussion / results of the discussion and I'll update
> it). Of course, if you have other ideas about the interface, just add them
> to the wiki page.
> Once I have some feedback here I'll file the bugs considered relevant into
> Bugzilla.
>
> Finally, as mentioned in the page, I'm trying to implement a few of my
> proposals, but am still very new to both C and the Rhythmbox codebase, so
> please consider this as a humble proposal without any commitment to future
> patches. While my proposals are not working patches, I hope they can help
> to bring Rhythmbox forward :)
>
> Thanks for your attention, and thanks for already making 2.9 rock!
> Good day.
>
> --
> Ronan Jouchet
> ______________________________**_________________
> rhythmbox-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/**listinfo/rhythmbox-devel<http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel>
>

_______________________________________________
rhythmbox-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.