Re: Discussion as to whether community based external plugins could/should be in the official source-tree

Fileorganizer was creative commons when I took over. I'm not sure about
it's gpl compatibility.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/

I would relicense future code to gpl v3 if required since all my personal
projects are gpl anyway. I'm just not familiar about the implications of
such a change.
On 02/11/2013 9:10 am, "Bastien Nocera" <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 21:51 +0000, David Mohammed wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> >   There are a number of GPL 2 & 3 based plugins that have been
> > converted to python3 and thus can & do run in the latest version of RB
> > (below).
>
> I hope they're GPLv2 and v3 with exception. Otherwise they're not
> license compatible.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhythmbox-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
>

_______________________________________________
rhythmbox-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel