Re: Discussion as to whether community based external plugins could/should be in the official source-tree
Donagh Horgan <[email protected]> Mon, 4 Nov 2013 20:56:03 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.apps.rhythmbox.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAK1wx5vQh_aABbt_4SiUmaQUKYiey4bjRhhcsMOCSFXJ1_=UdQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Sorry for the delayed reply. I'd be happy to re-license my code under those licenses, if necessary. Obviously, I can only speak for myself though. On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Bastien Nocera <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 2013-11-02 at 00:17 +0000, Donagh Horgan wrote: > > Hmmm...well that means it also depends on which licenses plugin > > developers would have to use. Is there a complete list available? > > GPLv2 or v3 with exception, or LGPL would be compatible. > > _______________________________________________ rhythmbox-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel