Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review
Andre Klapper <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad,gmane.comp.gnome.desktop |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Dienstag, den 24.02.2009, 15:47 +0100 schrieb Vincent Untz:
> Le mardi 24 février 2009, à 14:35 +0000, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro a écrit :
> > Does GnomePrint no longer belong in the GNOME Desktop platform?
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyfive/Desktop#upcoming_deprecations
> We've been trying to remove libgnomeprint* for quite some time now.
> Tomboy has been ported this cycle, so the bindings are the last steps, I
> believe.
To be exact: gnome-python-desktop and gnome-games (the latter to be
ported for 2.27.1, see
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=564655 ).
> > Does GnomeVFS no longer belong in the GNOME Developer platform?
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyfive/Platform#upcoming_deprecations
> > In case of Yes, would it be OK to keep the Python bindings where they
> > are and just mark them as deprecated? Else they'd have to move into
> > gnome-python-extras, I guess...
>
> For gnome-vfs, marking the bindings as deprecated makes sense, since
> gnome-vfs is still part of the platform at the moment.
The only modules still requiring gnome-vfs are:
* dasher: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572134
* gnome-mag through its libcolorblind dependency
* gnome-python
* gnome-utils: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=543713
* probably some other deprecated modules like libgnome/ui
That's all, and I hope gnome-vfs will die for 2.27.1, too.
andre
--
mailto:[email protected] | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
_______________________________________________
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad