Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review

"Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.desktop,gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad
Organization INESC Porto
Message-ID <1240758140.5821.69.camel@dark-tower>
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 21:41 +0100, Gian Mario Tagliaretti wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Andre Klapper <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Andre,
> 
> > * http://live.gnome.org/GtkPrintPort :
> > gnome-games, gnome-python-desktop, gnome-devel-docs (update)
> >
> > * http://live.gnome.org/GioPort :
> > PATCHES: dasher
> > TODO: gnome-python-desktop, gnome-utils/gsearchtool
> 
> I don't think that gnome-python-desktop would need removing GtkPrint
> and gnomeVFS, it contains GnomePrint python bindings which cannot be
> removed and I cannot find any reference to GnomeVFS that needs to be
> removed.
> 
> If I'm mistaking please correct me, cc'ing Gustavo for a better opinion.

Some months later, in gnome-2.28.modules file in jhbuild those two
modules are still part of gnome 2.28.  Someone please let me know if
this changes.

And anyway I am not going to bother to physically move code from one
module to another for just a couple of library bindings, just not worth
the trouble.

I am, however, welcome to take other steps to deprecate the bindings:
  1. Add a python warning every time the deprecated module is imported;
  2. Not build the deprecatd bindings by default unless a
--enable-deprecated-bindings option is used.

-- 
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
"The universe is always one step beyond logic" -- Frank Herbert
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.