Re: GStreamer per component virtual users

Filippo Argiolas <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Andre Klapper<[email protected]> wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 07.06.2009, 21:22 +0200 schrieb Filippo Argiolas:
>> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Andre Klapper<[email protected]> wrote:
>> > If you want to use both Assignee *and* QA address for watching those
>> > "users" you will lose watching when someone assigns a bug yo himselves
>> > (and hence removes the default assignee from the bug).
>>
>> Well I could say that this would be the expected behavior: if someone
>> assigns a bug to himself he's going to take care of it until it's
>> resolved so there is no reason for the others to keep watching it and
>> they can just CC themselves if still interested.

Hey, I'm back, I had a bunch of exams (and still have some next week
:-() and completely forgot about this thing :-P

> I disagree.
> I want to watch a bug from when I decided to subscribe until its end. I
> don't want to manually CC again just because someone starts working on
> it. Without this manual CC'ing I would never receive an email when it
> gets fixed.

Ok, I'm sorry then, I didn't have a clear idea about our bugzilla
setup and how bugzilla actually worked.
Anyway I'd still say that if I'm watching a whole product and someone
assigns a bug to himself I would be fine to not receive any more mail
from that bug since someone else is caring about it.
It's not like you decided to watch a bug and you get unsubscribed,
there's CC for that, we're talking about watching a whole product and
not getting notifications for assigned bugs.

> Gstreamer: So either everything remains as it is, or virtual users are
> created for each component and set as default QA contact, and every real
> person has to add all those virtual users to their watchlist if
> interested in watching the entire Gstreamer product.

I finally managed to come up with some good filtering with gmail, I
don't have disk space requirements and I can easily ignore bugs I
don't care labelling them by product name. So I'm fine to leave
everything as it is now, if any other gstreamer hacker will feel the
need for this change I guess we'll bring this up again.

Thanks for making everything more clear and sorry for the noise!

Ciao,

Filippo
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.