Re: Bugsquad 2009-08-03 meeting minutes
Leo Jackson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andre, Yes a dead line is needed +1 Regards, Leo Albert Jackson Jr lajjr --- On Sun, 8/9/09, Andre Klapper <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Andre Klapper <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Bugsquad 2009-08-03 meeting minutes > To: [email protected] > Date: Sunday, August 9, 2009, 5:06 PM > Am Dienstag, den 04.08.2009, 17:50 > +0100 schrieb Philip Withnall: > > Andre: By "updates", do we mean "releases" or > "commits"? It might be an > > idea to clarify in the e-mail. > > I'd go with commits here. > > > Andre: Do we want to mention a deadline for replying > to the e-mail, and > > say that if the maintainers don't reply by that date > then it'll be > > assumed their module is dead? > > Hmm. I think I was initially against this. E-mail is quite > error-prone. > But a "Please do respond within the next four weeks." > should be fine. > After that I'd probably try again and then close tickets. > > andre > -- > mailto:[email protected] | > failed > http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper > > _______________________________________________ > Gnome-bugsquad mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad >