Re: new keyword proposal

Andre Klapper <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 13:24 +0200 schrieb Olav Vitters:
> Comments from gnome-bugsquad?
> 
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 06:09:23PM -0400, William Jon McCann wrote:
> > In GNOME Shell development we have plenty of issues that require input
> > or decisions from designers (interaction/experience, visual, etc).  It
> > would be great to have a way for developers to mark bugs as needing
> > this attention and it would be great for designers to have an easy way
> > to find out what needs attention.
> > 
> > We already have a number of keywords but none of them really seem to
> > fit the bill (or are used for other purposes already):
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/describekeywords.cgi
> > 
> > Namely:
> >   * HIG
> >              Bug reporting an area where an application does not
> > follow the HIG.
> > 
> >   * ui-review
> >              Indicates a bug filed as part of the ui-review. Should be
> > used only by the ui-review team.
> > 
> >   * usability
> >              This keyword describes a usability/user interface
> > change where the correct behavior is not necessarily obvious and input
> > from the usability team is desired.
> > 
> > HIG is about compliance with consistency and behavior guidelines.
> > ui-review is a process request.  usability is somewhat like a
> > combination of the two.  It is not helpful for up-front experience
> > design issues.
> > 
> > Would adding a new "design" keyword be reasonable?  This would allow
> > the design team for any specific module to look at the bugs for that
> > module.  It wouldn't be for any kind of "design team" request.

Problem with "usability" keyword is that way too many reporters set it
without any reason.

I'd go with "ui-review" here and change the description slightly (like
"not meant to be set by reporter unless s/he knows what s/he does").
It has ten open tickets currently, and I don't think that we have an
ui-review team in place at all.

Same potential problems of course.

andre
-- 
 mailto:[email protected] | failed
 http://www.iomc.de/  | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.