Re: Re-working group security
Tobias Mueller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hey Hey :) Max Kanat-Alexander wrote: > The "hackers" group is itself now pretty much obsolete--there is a > "developers" group that is inherited by anybody in any product-specific > "developers" group. > > I'd like to propose that we delete the "hackers" group, and any bugs > currently assigned to it be re-assigned to the product-specific > "developers" group for the product the bug is in, which is a more > appropriate handling for security issues anyhow. (There are only 29 bugs > that we'd have to move.) > > That sound OK? > Hm. I'm not really convinced that this is a good idea, but that might be due to my limited knowledge about Bugzilla. The usecase I have in mind is, that I (as a bugmaster) might want to set a bugreport to a somewhat more confidential level, although I am not a developer of that product. Will that be still possible? > After that, we may want to discuss how to adapt Bugzilla to be more > appropriate for storing security and tracking issues for GNOME. *yay* > I talked to Owen a bit about this, and he mentioned that currently security > issues are reported by sending an email to [email protected], Oh, didn't know that. We should increase its visibility. Who's subscribed there? Are there any published policies (like http://www.kde.org/info/security/policy.php)? I'd be glad to help out building a security-researcher friendly infrastructure, but we should probably discuss that on a channel with more bandwidth. > Perhaps we should just auto-CC > "[email protected]" on any bug filed with a restriction to a security > group, and make it easier to file security bugs with an improved UI for it. > Sounds really good. Thanks for all your work! Tobi _______________________________________________ Gnome-bugsquad mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 259 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkqKrcsACgkQPuBX/6ogjZ5PEwCgrUVn1MC4cVZFkOIGJDDj5ccX hSYAn10ycrZaqGRG9srp1lBvUnTD60sx =wsD4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----