Re: Re-working group security

Tobias Mueller <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hey Hey :)

Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:
>     The "hackers" group is itself now pretty much obsolete--there is a 
> "developers" group that is inherited by anybody in any product-specific 
> "developers" group.
> 
>     I'd like to propose that we delete the "hackers" group, and any bugs 
> currently assigned to it be re-assigned to the product-specific 
> "developers" group for the product the bug is in, which is a more 
> appropriate handling for security issues anyhow. (There are only 29 bugs 
> that we'd have to move.)
> 
>     That sound OK?
> 
Hm. I'm not really convinced that this is a good idea, but that might be 
due to my limited knowledge about Bugzilla. The usecase I have in mind 
is, that I (as a bugmaster) might want to set a bugreport to a somewhat 
more confidential level, although I am not a developer of that product. 
Will that be still possible?

>     After that, we may want to discuss how to adapt Bugzilla to be more 
> appropriate for storing security and tracking issues for GNOME.
*yay*
> I talked to Owen a bit about this, and he mentioned that currently security 
> issues are reported by sending an email to [email protected],
Oh, didn't know that. We should increase its visibility. Who's 
subscribed there? Are there any published policies (like 
http://www.kde.org/info/security/policy.php)?
I'd be glad to help out building a security-researcher friendly 
infrastructure, but we should probably discuss that on a channel with 
more bandwidth.
> Perhaps we should just auto-CC 
> "[email protected]" on any bug filed with a restriction to a security 
> group, and make it easier to file security bugs with an improved UI for it.
>
Sounds really good.

Thanks for all your work!
   Tobi

_______________________________________________
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 259 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkqKrcsACgkQPuBX/6ogjZ5PEwCgrUVn1MC4cVZFkOIGJDDj5ccX
hSYAn10ycrZaqGRG9srp1lBvUnTD60sx
=wsD4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.