Re: Bugsquad Meeting Minutes 2009-09-05

Tobias Mueller <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Aloha! :-)

I just wanted to keep you updated on the open issues from the last meeting:

On 06.09.2009 00:16, Tobias Mueller wrote:
> == "Old untouched bugs" ==
> [..,]
> ACTIONS:
>  - JavierJardon to open a bug (Done:
>                        http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=594259)
>  - TobiasMueller to sync stock response to TriageGuide and
>    StockResponses (don't forget to mention "needinfo-trynewversion"
>    Keyword)
> 
DONE! :-)

> == Make more clear the triager workflow ==
> [...]
> 
> ACTIONS:
>  - JavierJardon to add diagram to TriageGuide (DONE)
>  - AkhilLadda to enhance the diagram by some rough guidelines on, e.g.,
>    when to set to NEW
> 
Not yet

> == Set up a bot to notify us about new bugs in #bugs ==
> [,,,[
> ACTIONS:
>  - TobiasMueller to mention #bzbot and #bugs in the BugSquad page.
>    (DONE)
>  - JavierJardon to fix pages shown up in [1] and [2] (DONE)
>  - TobiasMueller to update FindingDuplicates to mention the new s-d-f
>    replacement (TODO: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=594272)
> 
DONE



> == Refactor ProductSpecificGuidelines ==
> We have a bloated page at
> http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/TriageGuide/ProductSpecificGuidelines
> with many rules to obey.
> But simply deleting isn't an option because the information is actually
> necessary. So try to get rid of unneccessary rules such as "If possible
> get a backtrace from the user with all thread backtraces (i.e. using 'bt
> thread apply all' instead of 'bt' in GDB)".
> 
> We thus ask the maintainers to have a look at
> http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/TriageGuide/ProductSpecificGuidelines and
> clean their stuff up.
> 
> ACTIONS:
>  - TobiasMueller to write a mail to be send to maintainers or d-d-l to
>    ask for reviewing their rules. (GnomeBug:594243)
>  - Someone to send that mail
> 
Mail proposal follows

Dear Maintainers :)

We, the Bugsquad, wonder, how accurate the Product Specific Instructions
on live.gnome.org currently are. You can find the at
http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/TriageGuide/ProductSpecificGuidelines and
we kindly ask you to revisit the rules for your module.

For example it's not needed to ask for a stacktrace (of all threads)
because we ask the user to do that anyway
(http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces/Details).

Requesting output from a special program (xrandr, gconf, ...) or a log
is a good idea though.

So please visit
http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/TriageGuide/ProductSpecificGuidelines and
help us getting the most out of our bugreports :)

Thanks,
  Tobi
  for the GNOME Bugsquad


> == Bugsquad module in bugzilla ==
> It might be a good thing to have an own module to keep track of assigned
> tasks.
> 
> ACTIONS:
>  - TobiasMueller to file a bug against bugzilla.gnome.org/products
>    (DONE: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=594245)
> 
And we finally have our product :)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi?product=bugsquad
We actually try to use it as a ToDo tracker. It'll hopefully work out.
At least it's harder to forget things. Tracking todos via email is not
that easy (for me).

> The meeting ended after three hours, the rest of the agenda is deferred:
>    7. New project: BugsquadGoals
>    8. Report conclusions here: [[Bugsquad/DirectiveDiscussion]]
>    9. Future of Bugsquad/BugDays
>   10. Mail Notifications
>   11. Automatic CANEDIT permissions
>   12. Enable votes in Bugzilla or a method to say "this bugs affects me"
> 
We'll see how much we'll get done on our next meeting ;-)

Cheers,
  Tobi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkrP7xIACgkQPuBX/6ogjZ71eACfXUs/G81L1VLzmXvooX/rvTl3
GHoAnjLUwqC5XW+gb6L7OG/7z0W8F9hN
=VUbR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.