Re: Learning about BonoboControls/NautilusViews
Martin Kretzschmar <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.components |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1052168779.895.26.camel@localhost> |
Hi Michael, Am Don, 2003-04-24 um 20.01 schrieb Martin Kretzschmar: > > It'd be better IMHO to knock up a document in libbonobo/doc > > that describes the known tags, and gives a nice example for people to > > cut and paste I think. > > I thought that in the wiki it's much easier/quicker to correct or > comment on what's `knocked up' than with DocBook in CVS plus comments > over email. (Of course, the textareas of today's browsers lose when > compared to emacs) If OTOH there _is_ already a file (server-xml-reference.sgml) in libbonobo/doc/activation-api which ``only'' needs to be updated a bit, then, of course I'd work on that. (latest know html: http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/bonobo-activation/server-xml-reference.html ) And here's a question (I want to update the existing .server snippets): What would I use to replace this one (most minimal .server file) <oaf_info> <oaf_server iid="OAFIID:oaf_naming_service:7e2b90ef-eaf0-4239-bb7c-812606fcd80d" type="exe" location="oafd"> </oaf_server> <oaf_info> And here another one: Is it allowed to have such an entry for a factory <oaf_server iid="OAFIID:Bonobo_Sample_Echo_Factory" type="exe" location="/usr/lib/bonobo-2.0/samples/bonobo-echo-2"> </oaf_server> i.e. no description attribute, no name, not even repo_ids? Something different: the activation-api dir is not built atm. So I have to touch the doc build process anyways: do you want to keep the documentation from api (for libbonobo) and activation-api separated? Regards, Martin --