Re: Learning about BonoboControls/NautilusViews

Martin Kretzschmar <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.components
Message-ID <1052168779.895.26.camel@localhost>
Hi Michael,

Am Don, 2003-04-24 um 20.01 schrieb Martin Kretzschmar:
> >  It'd be better IMHO to knock up a document in libbonobo/doc
> > that describes the known tags, and gives a nice example for people to
> > cut and paste I think.
> 
> I thought that in the wiki it's much easier/quicker to correct or
> comment on what's `knocked up' than with DocBook in CVS plus comments
> over email. (Of course, the textareas of today's browsers lose when
> compared to emacs)

If OTOH there _is_ already a file (server-xml-reference.sgml) in
libbonobo/doc/activation-api which ``only'' needs to be updated a bit,
then, of course I'd work on that.

(latest know html:
http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/bonobo-activation/server-xml-reference.html )

And here's a question (I want to update the existing .server snippets):

What would I use to replace this one (most minimal .server file)

<oaf_info>
<oaf_server iid="OAFIID:oaf_naming_service:7e2b90ef-eaf0-4239-bb7c-812606fcd80d" 
  type="exe" location="oafd">
</oaf_server>
<oaf_info>

And here another one: Is it allowed to have such an entry for a factory

<oaf_server iid="OAFIID:Bonobo_Sample_Echo_Factory" type="exe" 
	location="/usr/lib/bonobo-2.0/samples/bonobo-echo-2">
</oaf_server>

i.e. no description attribute, no name, not even repo_ids?

Something different: the activation-api dir is not built atm. So I have to
touch the doc build process anyways: do you want to keep the documentation from
api (for libbonobo) and activation-api separated?

Regards,
	Martin
--
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.