Re: Problems building CVS libbonobo with jhbuild

A Ter, 2004-07-27 =E0s 17:06, Keith Sharp escreveu:
> On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 16:49 +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
> > A Ter, 2004-07-27 =E0s 16:45, Keith Sharp escreveu:
>=20
> [ snip ]
>=20
> > > Ok, I am really confused now!  I checked my different Makefile/.am/=
.in
> > > files and they have the above.  I then decided to try and build the=
 last
> > > stable release from source (2.6.2).  I downloaded the source, ran
> > > "jhbuild shell", and then did a ./configure && make - built first t=
ime.
> > >=20
> > > I then did a diff on configure.in, Makefile.am, and activation-serv=
er/
> > > Makefile.am between 2.6.2 and CVS HEAD, aside from some new transla=
tions
> > > in configure.in there is no difference between the versions.
> >=20
> >   In that case, the difference must be somewhere in your autotools.  =
You
> > could try 'jhbuild bootstrap' to install the recommended auto* tools.
>=20
> Hmm, this is what I did:
>=20
> jhbuild bootstrap
> jhbuild update
> jhbuild build -a -c -n
>=20
> Using anonymous CVS, building moduleset 'gnome28' and modules 'meta-
> gnome-desktop'.
>=20
> Is there anyway to tell which versions of the autotools were used to
> create the 2.6.2 release?

  Look at the top of the 'configure' for autoconf version (2.59 here).=20
Look at the top of any Makefile.in file for the automake version (1.7.9
here).

>=20
> Thanks,
>=20
> Keith.
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-components-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-components-list
--=20
Gustavo Jo=E3o Alves Marques Carneiro
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
The universe is always one step beyond logic.