Re: suggest: make searches efficient

"Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.dashboard.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 06/01/2008, D Bera <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey,
>   These days searching gives me headache. There is too many
> information out there. I frequently have to use complicated and
> cleverly thought query syntax to narrow my searches (same for Google).
> I always change my query if I have to visit more than the first 20
> results (again, same for Google). I never realized that personal
> information space could be so vast and varied :-/.
>
>   So I ask you for suggestions, how to make searches efficient ?
>
>   Please suggest only tangible methods e.g. no neural network based
> context-sensitive feedback tracking system to determine what the user
> had in mind. We will leave dashboard for that :)
>
>   E.g. frequently I know what kind of things I am looking for - a
> photo, an email, a contact, an application etc. The query syntax
> allows you to type "filetype:image" or "type:Contact" or
> "source:application" to specify the needs. But thinking and typing
> that elaborate thing will often take enough time to destroy my desire
> in continuing searching. Could be add interesting query syntax to make
> it easier ? It has to be short and easy. But it should not deviate
> from the obvious meaning e.g. if we decide adding "videos" to the
> query would only query videos then that would destroy searches with
> the intent of finding the word "video" in the data/metadata.
>
> Anything that could be done on the UI side ? A drop box of every
> possible data type ? My problem with a drop box is if it is naively
> filled with entries, I have to click on it, scroll through the list
> and then click again to select the type ... thats 2 clicks and a huge
> careful scrolling!
>
> This will require an ongoing effort, so be creative.
>
> Email partially inspired by looking at the deskbar, gnome-do,
> kbeaglebar etc. On small systems, they work nicely and return you the
> apps or contacts etc. But they are designed to encourage you to look
> in the first 5-10 results only. That does not work in a long used
> system with lots of different data. Note that quicksilver or launcher
> specific apps do not have this problem since they already search
> within a narrow search scope.
>

How about: http://www.statsbiblioteket.dk/search/index.jsp?query=beagle&first_search=true&action=classic

Ie cluster/facet extraction on the result set? It is far from trvial
to do in an efficient and scalable way, but it can be done... The
website I linked to have 10M items in the index.

Cheers,
Mikkel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.