Re: Beagle license change proposal from MIT/X11 to GPLv3
Debajyoti Bera <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.dashboard.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Mirco, > [please keep my CCed, I am not subscribed to dashboard-hackers (if thats a > mailing list)] oops... sorry. This was my first post http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04459.html > The whole issue was/is solved with a SemWeb version that is GPLv2+ > licensed (beagle uses/used a CC-by-2.0 only version though). So does that mean as long as we use a Semweb that is dual licensed, there is _nothing_else_ that we need to do ? > Here a short copy/paste from the IRC > 18:57:37 <meebey> http://www.apache.org/foundation/licence-FAQ.html#GPL > 18:57:45 <meebey> SemWeb is GPL-2 or later > 18:58:05 <meebey> so beagle as combined work: MIT + GPLv2+ + APL -> > (becomes as combined work) GPLv3 > MIT being beagle itself > GPLv2 being SemWeb > APL being lucene.net - dBera -- ----------------------------------------------------- Debajyoti Bera @ http://dtecht.blogspot.com beagle / KDE / Mandriva / Inspiron-1100