Re: [gnome-db] GdaSqlBuilder: IDs

On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 18:06 +0200, Vivien Malerba wrote:
> On 17 May 2010 15:34, Murray Cumming <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I have some general thoughts about the IDs used with the GdaSqlBuilder
> > functions:
> >
> > 1.
> > I think we should have a GdaSqlBuilderID typedef. That will make things
> > easier if this type is every more complex in some future API-breaking
> > version of libgda. This would not break code that currently uses guint.
> 
> I really don't envision other things than guint as they are only an
> index into internal objects, so I don't think it's necessary.

Nevertheless, I think it makes the API clearer. I'll prepare a patch for
you later and give you another chance to accept it. I know you might
not.

> Yes, you're right. Specifying an ID to be used (instead of letting the
> sql builder object assign one) should be removed. If you have the time
> to do it, that's better as I don't have much time at the moment to
> work on this.  Otherwise I'll do it ASAP.

I'll do this first. I'm happy to have some way to help, after you've
helped me so much.

-- 
[email protected]
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com