Re: [gnome-db] GdaSqlBuilder: IDs

On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 19:18 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 18:06 +0200, Vivien Malerba wrote:
> > On 17 May 2010 15:34, Murray Cumming <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I have some general thoughts about the IDs used with the GdaSqlBuilder
> > > functions:
> > >
> > > 1.
> > > I think we should have a GdaSqlBuilderID typedef. That will make things
> > > easier if this type is every more complex in some future API-breaking
> > > version of libgda. This would not break code that currently uses guint.
> > 
> > I really don't envision other things than guint as they are only an
> > index into internal objects, so I don't think it's necessary.
> 
> Nevertheless, I think it makes the API clearer. I'll prepare a patch for
> you later and give you another chance to accept it. I know you might
> not.

Here it is, in case you change your mind:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621532


-- 
[email protected]
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com