Re: [gnome-db] introspection issue

Murray Cumming <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.db
Message-ID <1299853012.7941.2.camel@murrayc-desktop>
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 15:07 +0100, Vivien Malerba wrote:
> On 11 March 2011 12:47, Murray Cumming <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 12:13 +0100, Vivien Malerba wrote:
> >> On 10 March 2011 15:25, Murray Cumming <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > What's the state of libgda introspection now generally?
> >>
> >> I'd say it is completed and only some bugs may remain as AFAIK it has
> >> not been tested a  lot (last time I wheck using JS bindings and it was
> >> Ok). In other words I don't currently have any identified activity
> >> regarding GObject introspection, but of course I'll correct anything
> >> which is not working correctly.
> >
> > OK. I'm building stuff now. These warnings might be interesting to you:
> >
> > (process:2784): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: Flags for property
> > 'editing-canceled' on class 'GdauiEntryString' are not compatible with
> > the property oninterface 'GtkCellEditable'
> >
> >
> > (process:2784): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: Flags for property
> > 'editing-canceled' on class 'GdauiEntryNumber' are not compatible with
> > the property oninterface 'GtkCellEditable'
> >
> >
> > (process:2784): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: Flags for property
> > 'editing-canceled' on class 'GdauiEntryCommonTime' are not compatible
> > with the property oninterface 'GtkCellEditable'
> 
> Is it from the gtk3 branch that you build? I thought I had fixed these
> warnings in that branch.

No, I'm using master.

Surely the latest stuff should be in master? You could branch the stable
stuff to a stable branch.

-- 
[email protected]
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.