Re: [gnome-db] GI improvements: Starting... vararg

Johannes Schmid <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.db
Message-ID <1303195535.1744.2.camel@Obelix>
Hi!

Am Montag, den 18.04.2011, 14:30 -0500 schrieb Daniel Espinosa:
> I've updated bug #639472, with a patch to add (skip) annotation for
> any function using vararg, because they are unbindingable. This is the
> list of functions required to be re-implemented with equivalents using
> arrays as described on:

Have you checked if non-vararg equivalents exist for this functions?
Murray and me spend quite some time to add those to be able to create C
++ Bindings and I would wonder if there are many left.

Regards,
Johannes

_______________________________________________
gnome-db-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk2tL44ACgkQAvZZn2XJ+bPT7gCgoUyAN+X3ekyYM9L7g/kYmjXb
weUAn2sZU+V336hLHj4ZMbtBcqiZoZlS
=m3fW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.