Re: [gnome-db] recent GSEAL addition

Daniel Espinosa <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.db
Message-ID <CAHirWt+z1-ZObVre4K9iHijWBaKUiMR=42eZd-SHABh832q5bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Ok.

Following with GdaNumeric sealing I've commit a patch to make
GSEAL_ENABLE take effect using:

make CFLAGS+="-DGSEAL_ENABLE=1"

with it I've found an fixed internal SQLite and PostgreSQL providers.
Others must be fixed when required (I didn't because I don't have them
installed)


The next structs to be sealed must be GdaBinary and GdaBlob, I think.

2011/11/13 Murray Cumming <[email protected]>:
> On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 22:30 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
>> On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 22:29 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
>> > OK. The API certainly is much nicer this way.
>> >
>> > I wonder if this patch would be an ABI or API break. It makes wrapping
>> > GdaNumeric from language bindings much easier - in this case libgdamm.
>>
>> Sorry, here is the patch.
>
> I think it's not an ABI break, so I'll push it. It makes life easier for
> language bindings.
>
> --
> [email protected]
> www.murrayc.com
> www.openismus.com
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.