Re: [gnome-db] libgda 4.2.x doesn't compile anymore in debian unstable
Andrea Zagli <[email protected]> Wed, 24 Jul 2013 19:17:49 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.db |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Il giorno mer 24 lug 2013 16:57:46 CEST, Daniel Espinosa ha scritto: > 2013/7/24 Andrea Zagli <[email protected]> > >> Il giorno mar 23 lug 2013 20:19:15 CEST, Daniel Espinosa ha scritto: >> >> Hi Andrea, >>> >>> Yes this is a problem with resent GObject Introspection. I've managed to >>> fix the same problem for libgda-5.0.4 version. >>> >>> Exists interest in libgda-4.0? This is important to know if is better to >>> work on that banch. >>> >>> Is it more stable than 5.0? >>> >> >> >> i often develop under gnu/linux and then i compile under windows (i prefer >> to compile under windows instead of cross compile...) >> >> i still develop with 4.2.x because 5.x depends on gtk 3 and gtk 3 under >> windows, that i know, isn't yet stable (i'll try asap new version) >> > > Are you using GTK+ widgets on GDA for your applications or just libgda? yes i use some widgets > [...] >> > Why are you using resent version of GObject Introspection? AFAIK is better > to use version released at the time GDA 4.2 was in order to avoid conflicts > like the one you've found. > i'm using what i find in the distro > If you aren't using GObject Introspection and GDA-UI (Gtk+ widgets) at all, > may you can use following switches: > > ./configure --without-ui --disable-gda-gi --disable-gdaui-gi > > They allows you to compile without that dependencies. ok i tried with --disable-*-gi and it seems to work at the same time i'm trying the gtk3 and libgda5 status under win... and it seems a good state ;-) thanks a lot >> LibGDA-5.0.x is included in Debian Wheezy, I'm working to fix most of bugs >>> reported against GObject Introspection and Vala bindings. >>> >>> Upcoming LibGDA-5.2 have lot of fixes on GObject Introspection and Vala >>> bindings, make it more usable for other languages. >>> >>> Do I need to backport them? >>> >>> >>> 2013/7/23 Andrea Zagli <[email protected]> >>> >>> the problem seems to be gir (1.36.0-2+b1) >>>> >>>> thanks in advance >>>> [...]