Re: gdl-dock-* license
Johannes Schmid <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.devtools |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1205348460.6605.12.camel@idefix> |
Hi! I think Naba tried to send mail to all constributer to change license to LGPL but I don't know if he was fully successful. Regards, Johannes Am Mittwoch, den 12.03.2008, 17:48 +0100 schrieb Preben: > > As far as I understand gdl-dick*-files are released under LGPL! > > Sorry, not gnome-dick*-files, but gnome-dock*-files! > > > However, there is a dependency from these files to the file: libgdltypebuiltins.h, which again > > depends on gdl.h, which is released under GPL? > > > > The libgdltypebuiltins.h file is auto generated by some tool, so is it possible to not generate a > > dependency to gdl.h-file? > > > > gdl-switcher is released under the GPL, and not LGPL - is this an error? It seems to me, that the > > file is in fact only related to the gdl-dock-* files which are LGPL? > > This is very confusing! > > > > We are currently moving away from a qt-project due to license issues (we want it even more free). > > However these issues seem to repeat themselves, if we get stuck in GPL anyway with these docking > > widgets? > > > > Why is the whole library not LGPL? > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-devtools mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devtools _______________________________________________ gnome-devtools mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devtools
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBH2ChsAvZZn2XJ+bMRAsW9AJ0XjUiC77bSaDCcBo/FOC4zx7TORQCfZ3GZ UIiqBVhbhYJqHQciDaewpiM= =bb5E -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----