Re: "libtool" performance... / was: Re: Announcing Dolt, a drop-in Libtool replacement which cuts build timesin half
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:18:01 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.devtools,gmane.comp.kde.devel.general,gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.general,gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 05:12:48PM +0200, Attila Kinali wrote: > On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:34:14 +0300 > Daniel Stone <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestion, but given the choice between forking a > > multi-thousand-line shell script and replacing it with a ten line shell > > script, I think we'll stick with the one that isn't insane. > > If you care about sane tools, why do you use auto* and libtool > in the first place? Because I personally hate each and every single person who attempts to build X, and my dying wish is to cripple the project with subpar build infrastructure. Either that or it was the best choice. Thanks for the heads-up though, much appreciated. _______________________________________________ gnome-devtools mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devtools
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH/4EpUVYB1rKAgJQRAojqAJ9/vJbLPJOZm1VJodVQ8qLlnLm3jQCfRFT9 dTRSQzJmAFAtuCW82gYxWrg= =5hC+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----