Re: [GDL] build problems
Gustavo Giráldez <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.devtools |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi! Sorry for the long absence, I was enjoying my last vacation days :-) Back at home now. On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 06:18, Jeroen Zwartepoorte wrote: > Hi John, > > On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 06:51, John (J5) Palmieri wrote: > > I ran into a couple of build problems with GDL. > > Gustavo changed some stuff recently to the build process, but it builds > fine on my machines (fedora + ydl). Yeah, for maintainer cvs builds both full deprecated flags and error compiler warnings are enabled. For released tarballs they are disabled though. > > * -fno-strict-aliasing needs to be set as a build flag or it will warn > > on (gpointer *) &widget. Since -Werror is set this causes GDL not to > > build. > > Should we really set -Werror as a default in the build? I know i removed > it from glimmer at one point because different platforms generated > different warnings and broke the build. In my experience, setting -Werror has helped me a lot in finding both typos and very weird bugs. I prefer not to remove them, but fix the warnings instead. I'm also using Fedora, but I got that compiler warning. I already committed a fix for it. FWIW, my GCC version is 3.3.2. > > * libssl development files are needed for the build (why do we use SSL?) > > but does not error out when running ./configure. > > I have no idea why we would need libssl. Strange. This is weird. The only library I can think of which might need libssl is gnome-vfs. Maybe it's a bug in its pkg-config file? I have an up-to-date jhbuild HEAD build and gdl compiles fine now. Regards, Gustavo