Re: Scaffold, plugins and language independence
"John (J5) Palmieri" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.devtools |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 2004-02-06 at 10:38, Archit Baweja wrote: > Hey! > > What about Ruby plugins? I would assume the same holds for Ruby if they make it easy to wrap GObjects. I will check out Ruby as a bunch of people have told me it is good. Oh, jeeze yet another language to learn :-) I hope I don't like it as I have been really digging Python for some time. Well perhaps I can replace Perl, I've been trying to forget that language for a while now :-0 Just kidding. -- J5 > Archit > > "John (J5) Palmieri" <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 14:37, Mikoyan wrote: > > > Hello scaffold developers, > > > > > > we have taken interest in Scaffold and its current plans. > > > But we have a simple question: since glib's plugin > > > system is going to be used (GModule+GTypePlugin?), what's > > > the deal with plugins for scaffold and the langauge they > > > are writtin in? E.g. how easy is it to write a plugin in > > > python and use it without any problem? > > > > Good question. Well I guess the interfaces will have to be wrapped in > > Python. Not to hard to do for GObjects so it should be the same for > > interfaces I am assuming. Check out > > http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-wrap/. I for one > > would welcome Python plugins. > > > > -- > > J5 > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Mikoyan & Bart > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > gnome-devtools mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devtools > > _______________________________________________ > > gnome-devtools mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devtools > _______________________________________________ > gnome-devtools mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devtools