Re: Release status of GtkSourceView 1.1.90 for Debian?
Andrew Lau <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.devtools |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20050123062753.GA8567@espresso> |
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 09:07:51PM +0100, Paolo Borelli wrote:
> From a packaging point of view the only potential problem is that
> among the new .lang files, there is nemerle.lang which some mono
> package (I don't remember which one, maybe MonoDevelop) used to
> distribute and thus may be conflicting: the sanest thing would be to
> not include the file in the mono package and upgrade its required
> version of gtksourceview, if that is not possible I guess you can
> patch out nemerle.lang from the gtksourceview package.
>
> The decision is up to you, let us know what you decide.
Yeah. That's possible. libgtksourceview-cil had to drop vbnet.lang last
time and delegate it to libgtksourceview-common. So feel free to include
nemerle.lang. I'll pass on the required bug reports to Debian's Mono
group.
> Thanks for taking care of gtksourceview in debian!
You're welcome.
Cheers,
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau <http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~alau/>
Debian GNU/Linux Maintainer & UNSW Computing Students' Society President
-
"Nobody expects the Debian Inquisition!
Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency!"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
gnome-devtools mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devtools
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB80PpmyTAfS6LaL0RAtd3AJ9vc19/12PmG4TFEtQpnnaPOvzwBACfbcqw M+KpCThXljM8CiIJj58Nwzw= =92BF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----