Re: Proposal: GNOME Docs String Freeze
Gunnar Hjalmarsson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2017-05-31 08:40, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 02:14 +0200, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote: >> On 2017-05-30 23:10, Andre Klapper wrote: >>> My understanding is that the currently non-existing >>> documentation string freeze is a result of missing (wo)manpower >>> and the tight release schedule. Assuming that any "late" changes >>> are actual bug fixes and not cosmetic changes (please correct me >>> if I'm wrong), I'd prefer correct documentation in English to >>> incorrect (but translated) documentation. >> >> Due to a lack of manpower it will never be perfect, of course, and >> the later a change is made, the greater is the risk that all the >> translator teams won't catch up. But isn't it somewhat >> contradictory to ship 'translated' docs with strings which the >> translators have not even had a fair *chance* to translate? > > Of course that's something to avoid - that's why I differentiated > between cosmetic late changes and late bug fixes. As long as there > are not so many people working on our docs, shipping incorrect (but > translated) docs to users sounds worse to me than shipping correct > English docs. Would you disagree with this? Well.. If you restrict "bug fixes" to directly misleading guidance, then I agree on 'better correct than translated'. I look at this from my Ubuntu POV and the desktop guide of the latest LTS (long term support) release, where 7 languages are literally 100% translated, and another 14 languages are >90% translated. Late changes are always an annoyance to translator teams with a high level of ambition. Now I'm going to encourage the Ubuntu translator teams to be at least as good at translating gnome-user-docs upstream as they previously were at translating the ubuntu-docs package via Launchpad. (Some of them already are, fortunately.) That won't give us more docs writers, but hopefully it will help improve the translation coverage a little bit. >> I for one see Jeremy's proposal as a reasonable step in the right >> direction. > > I'd also agree with Jeremy, //once GNOME had way more people working > on docs//. I hear what you say. ;) Rgds, -- Gunnar Hjalmarsson https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj