Re: Proposal: GNOME Docs String Freeze

Gunnar Hjalmarsson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.documentation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2017-05-31 08:40, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 02:14 +0200, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
>> On 2017-05-30 23:10, Andre Klapper wrote:
>>> My understanding is that the currently non-existing
>>> documentation string freeze is a result of missing (wo)manpower
>>> and the tight release schedule. Assuming that any "late" changes
>>> are actual bug fixes and not cosmetic changes (please correct me
>>> if I'm wrong), I'd prefer correct documentation in English to
>>> incorrect (but translated) documentation.
>> 
>> Due to a lack of manpower it will never be perfect, of course, and
>> the later a change is made, the greater is the risk that all the
>> translator teams won't catch up. But isn't it somewhat
>> contradictory to ship 'translated' docs with strings which the
>> translators have not even had a fair *chance* to translate?
> 
> Of course that's something to avoid - that's why I differentiated 
> between cosmetic late changes and late bug fixes. As long as there
> are not so many people working on our docs, shipping incorrect (but 
> translated) docs to users sounds worse to me than shipping correct 
> English docs. Would you disagree with this?

Well.. If you restrict "bug fixes" to directly misleading guidance, then 
I agree on 'better correct than translated'.

I look at this from my Ubuntu POV and the desktop guide of the latest 
LTS (long term support) release, where 7 languages are literally 100% 
translated, and another 14 languages are >90% translated. Late changes 
are always an annoyance to translator teams with a high level of ambition.

Now I'm going to encourage the Ubuntu translator teams to be at least as 
good at translating gnome-user-docs upstream as they previously were at 
translating the ubuntu-docs package via Launchpad. (Some of them already 
are, fortunately.) That won't give us more docs writers, but hopefully 
it will help improve the translation coverage a little bit.

>> I for one see Jeremy's proposal as a reasonable step in the right
>> direction.
> 
> I'd also agree with Jeremy, //once GNOME had way more people working
> on docs//.

I hear what you say. ;)

Rgds,

-- 
Gunnar Hjalmarsson
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.