Re: Proposal: GNOME Docs String Freeze

Jeremy Bicha <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.documentation
Message-ID <CAAajCMZEjiD-T2GyE=mhWHwVqg6J21jduvqF+kbW=n31wQvA6g@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Petr Kovar <[email protected]> wrote:
> Assuming that we don't want to block bug fixes to docs because of
> translations (which are, arguably, also wrong and need fixing), I'd propose
> making more bug fix releases than just .1 and .2. Rolling a new tarball is
> pretty cheap on the upstream side and we could, for example, release a
> 3.26.3 (or, 3.26.1.1, 3.26.2.1, etc.), which would follow some formal
> process of string freeze period. This would only apply to docs packages, of
> course.
>
> I think that would be a good compromise. Thoughts?

Yes, absolutely. I tried coming up with a simple, easily
understandable proposal but I think my initial proposal was *too*
simple. Adding a procedure for thawing and refreezing for bugfix
updates sounds very appropriate.

As a translator, how long would you suggest we wait after re-freezing
before releasing the new tarball?

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/783387 is an example of a high-impact bug I
think would definitely qualify for fixing in stable releases.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bicha
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.