Re: Thoughts on tagging docs issues in GitLab

docs-help and docs-devel don't sound too bad to me

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Shaun McCance <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 16:53 +0100, David King wrote:
> > On 2017-09-07 11:45, Shaun McCance <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Standardized tag names for docs will help us a lot. Heck, we never
> > > did
> > > manage to get standardized component names for docs in Bugzilla. If
> > > we
> > > get out in front of this thing, we can do better.
> > >
> > > I would be perfectly happy with the preopulated "documentation"
> > > tag,
> > > except that it's going to get used for both user and developer
> > > docs.
> > > There are generally two completely different collections of
> > > eyeballs
> > > looking at those lists.
> > >
> > > What about "userdocs" and "develdocs"? Or (uglier) "docsuser" and
> > > "docsdevel" so they sort together and show up in a list where you'd
> > > expect to see "docs" or "documentation"?
> > I think "help" would be apt for end-user documentation, as it fits
> > the
> > directory name. Of course, it has the problem that you might get
> > users
> > asking for help there. For developer-oriented documentation, the
> > standard "documentation" tag seems to fit well enough.
>
> I had thought the same thing. Use "documentation" for developer docs
> and "help" for user docs. It would work out OK if everybody knows the
> rules on when to use which. But it has the disadvantage of not being
> self-documenting in the way "userdocs" and "develdocs" are. But as you
> mention, it does nicely mirror directory names.
>
> --
> Shaun
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-doc-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
>

_______________________________________________
gnome-doc-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list