Re: Thoughts on tagging docs issues in GitLab
Shaun McCance <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Folks, There's a discussion happening on a GitLab issue regarding common labels, including those used for docs. If you're interested, comment there: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/Infrastructure/issues/22 On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 11:45 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote: > Hi all, > > GNOME has begun a slow migration to GitLab. This includes using > GitLab > instead of Bugzilla for bugs going forward. We need to figure out a > way > to get a handle on docs bugs across projects. > > GitLab issues don't have components like Bugzilla, so it doesn't have > any sort of per-component default assignee that we can abuse to > assign > things to the docs team. Instead, we have labels. Luckily, you can > search for labels across projects. > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/groups/GNOME/issues?label_name[]=documentati > on > > That's all issues tagged with "documentation" across any project > under > the GNOME group. The "documentation" tag is one of the prepopulated > tags that GitLab recommends. > > Standardized tag names for docs will help us a lot. Heck, we never > did > manage to get standardized component names for docs in Bugzilla. If > we > get out in front of this thing, we can do better. > > I would be perfectly happy with the preopulated "documentation" tag, > except that it's going to get used for both user and developer docs. > There are generally two completely different collections of eyeballs > looking at those lists. > > What about "userdocs" and "develdocs"? Or (uglier) "docsuser" and > "docsdevel" so they sort together and show up in a list where you'd > expect to see "docs" or "documentation"? > > Discuss. > > -- > Shaun > > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-doc-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list