Re: [dconf-editor] string freeze break (or opinions) request

Piotr Drąg <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.documentation,gmane.comp.gnome.internationalization.general
Message-ID <CAE4jGzrtY7+ZwVQkZXQhzfkupB3M3RcAPsY5JY_bEkK2swwU3Q@mail.gmail.com>
2018-03-05 9:42 GMT+01:00 Arnaud Bonatti <[email protected]>:
> Hello everybody! Reviewing translations of the “dconf-editor” module I
> maintain, I’ve discovered that I had a string generation problem: in
> the gschema file, four strings contains line breaks, but these line
> breaks doesn’t finish in the po files, and so the translations made by
> translators do not finish in the application. So sad. :·( That has
> been reported in the Bugzilla instance by Piotr Drąg[1] against GLib
> using another module as example.
>
> So. I’m not sure if I’m in a “string freeze break request” case or not
> (I don’t find my exact case in the Wiki[2]), but I have two
> proposition for fixing these bug-ly untranslated strings:

I’d say this is covered by “Marking a message for translation that was
previously not marked for translation by accident.” Even though the
string was technically translatable, the translation couldn’t be used.

>  – Proposition 1: fix the string generation using “&#xA;&#xA;” in the
> gschema file, and let translators redo the translations;
>  – Proposition 2: replace the two line breaks by one space, so that
> all translations already done work, but without any line break (and
> I’d change the strings next cycle for what is wanted).

In a perfect world, we would fix bug #793931 properly. As we live in
this world, I think proposition 2 is the best solution for 3.28, and
we can deal with the bigger problem in 3.30. The decision is yours,
though.

> I had also planned a 1bis proposition, where I fix the gschema file
> and all the translations in one patch, avoiding work from translators,
> but following previous discussion, that’s probably not a path I can
> follow. ;)
>

The difference is that this would be a change (presumably) consulted
with and approved by the translation teams, which makes it OK. :P

> Anyway, should I do something, or not, and if yes what? That’s not an
> important change, but for now translators are working on strings that
> doesn’t appear, and that lost time makes me sad. :·(
>

I would like to say that I really appreciate your concern!

Best regards,

-- 
Piotr Drąg
https://piotrdrag.fedorapeople.org
_______________________________________________
gnome-doc-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.