Re: Stupefied? Why can I not get Camel to see my provider when installing from RPM?

Jules Colding <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.evolution.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 12:28 +0100, Jules Colding wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am really starting to doubt my sanity here... 

My sanity was proven OK upon closer inspection, but my intellect seems
to be lacking in the performance department...

"strace" showed me that a file wasn't being created. Fixing that made
evolution-brutus load as expected.

Sorry for the noise,
  jules



> I am having no problems
> whatsoever with my Camel provider when installing from source and I can
> build and install the RPMs without any problems at all. 
> 
> The weird part is that my Camel provider is ignored by e-d-s when
> installing from RPMs although the very same files are installed from
> either installation method.
> 
> In summary: I am trying to install evolution-brutus from RPM on FC4. I
> have the Evolution 2.4 related RPMs from "www.nrpms.net" (good mirror
> here: "http://nrpms.opus11.net/rpms/"). You can get the evolution-brutus
> RPMs here:
> 
>    http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist
> 
> 
> You do not need a running Brutus server to install evolution-brutus and
> configure a Brutus based account, but you won't be able to use it for
> anything without a Brutus server somewhere.
> 
> What goes wrong is that the Brutus server type is missing when
> configuring a mail account :-(
> 
> How do I figure out what I am doing wrong? Any help will be greatly
> appreciated.
> 
> 
> Thanks a lot in advance,
>   jules
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Evolution-hackers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.