Re: Windows version status?

On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 11:43 +0000, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> On må, 2006-05-08 at 11:46 +0100, Pejvan BEIGUI wrote:
> 
> > I have been following the Evolution mailing list for a while now, but
> > I can't seem to find any information about the Windows port,
> > mentionned here:
> > http://go-evolution.org/Evo2.6#W32.2Fx64_porting    even though the
> > 2.6 has now been released. 
> 
> It's a wiki, you are free to add stuff there if you intend to help with
> a port to 64-bit Windows, if that is what the rather cryptic mention on
> that page means... I personally don't have any plans to port Evolution
> to 64-bit Windows. (Well, actually, building *Evolution* for 64-bit
> Windows would presumably not be a big deal at all, once all the
> dependencies are in place. Hint: none of them, not even a suitable
> compiler, are.)

Now, what would be neat would be a port to .NET 2.0 Managed C,
especially if it could be done without architecture dependencies.  Then
one build would work on x86, x86_64, IA64, etc.

I, however, am not volunteering.
-- 
Zan Lynx <[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
Evolution-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBEY6FTG8fHaOLTWwgRAgnSAJ0Y4UzdOw19U5ff4nNmdY41r5MAzQCdFWoj
hfKHL1a7h84AojUhiSsBxLA=
=kzo+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----