Re: ECalComponentAttendee and ECalComponentOrganizer - an invitation to memory leaks?

Hi Jules,

On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 14:41 +0200, Jules Colding wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Several members of the above mentioned structures are of the 'const char
> *' type. One such member is 'value'.
> 
> The message from the API designer, when declaring something 'const char
> *', is commonly that the memory management of that parameter/member is
> the responsibility of whoever allocated the memory.
Yes, the memory for the members such as "value" is managed inside the
ECalComponent itself. The caller need not allocate the memory.
> 
> The usage of ECalComponentAttendee and ECalComponentOrganizer data
> structures in e-d-s is, OTOH, that they are given to some ECalComponent
> and are never touched by the callee again (unless I am totally wrong
> here).
> 
> So should data for e.g. the 'value' member be g_strdup'ed to 'value' (as
> does the Groupwise calendar backend) contrary to the expectation that
> the callee should manage the memory for that member?
Groupwise backend does it wrongly which needs to be fixed. Thanks for
pointing it out.


thanks, Chenthill.