Re: Camel in evolution-data-server, a different proposal
Philip Van Hoof <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.evolution.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 15:58 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote: > Evolution-Data-Server handles PIM data - (mail / calendaring / contacts > information, journals) packaging them together *does* make lot of sense. > I do not think you are suggesting that every library should be packaged > separately, are you ? Well ;-) .... not should. But it would be nice yes. All of the libraries that require the server to run, however, do perhaps indeed belong to the same package / tarball. > Philip - Nobody is any better with these long winding arguments back and > forth. Can we get to the business at hand ? > > Let us spend our energies together on the camel-mmap patch instead. I agree. Nevertheless, it's my opinion that evolution-data-server can be better organised. It's, however, not blocking me. It's just annoyances. -- Philip Van Hoof, software developer at x-tend home: me at pvanhoof dot be gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org work: vanhoof at x-tend dot be http://www.pvanhoof.be - http://www.x-tend.be