Re: Patch: Camel stream filter waits properly for slow streams
Philip Van Hoof <[email protected]> Tue, 20 May 2008 17:03:48 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.apps.tinymail.devel,gmane.comp.gnome.evolution.patches,gmane.comp.gnome.evolution.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1211295828.9291.25.camel@schtrumpf> |
Adding some people and mailing lists in CC Reattaching patch for Evolution-hackers mailing list. Please bring this upstream too, José Response from Jeffrey: jeff_ yea, you should compare against -1 jeff_ as long as it returns >0, it wrote all the data jeff_ -1 is error jeff_ 0 is EOF maybe jeff_ if write even returns 0 ever On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 16:10 +0200, José Dapena Paz wrote: > Hi, > > This patch for tinymail modifies a bit the implementation of do_write > method in camel_stream_filter, to make it not fail simply because the > stream is slow. In my case I'm getting problems writting to a bluetooth > stream, as it sometimes writes less than the full buffer, and then the > stream filter returns -1. > > Anyway, it seems that my code adds an active wait. How could I fix > this? Any safe idea? > > Changelog entry would be: > * libtinymail-camel/camel-lite/camel/camel-stream-filter.c: > * (do_write): if the camel_stream_write call does not write the > full buffer but it's not due to an error, then loop to go on > writing the stream. -- Philip Van Hoof, freelance software developer home: me at pvanhoof dot be gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org http://pvanhoof.be/blog http://codeminded.be _______________________________________________ tinymail-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tinymail-devel-list
(unnamed)
(text/x-patch, 847 B)
Index: libtinymail-camel/camel-lite/camel/camel-stream-filter.c
===================================================================
--- libtinymail-camel/camel-lite/camel/camel-stream-filter.c (revision 3671)
+++ libtinymail-camel/camel-lite/camel/camel-stream-filter.c (working copy)
@@ -290,6 +290,7 @@
struct _filter *f;
size_t presize, len, left = n;
char *buffer, realbuffer[READ_SIZE+READ_PAD];
+ size_t written = 0;
p->last_was_read = FALSE;
@@ -321,8 +322,13 @@
f = f->next;
}
- if (camel_stream_write(filter->source, buffer, len) != len)
- return -1;
+ for (written = 0; written < len;) {
+ size_t just_written;
+ just_written = camel_stream_write (filter->source, buffer + written, len - written);
+ if (just_written == -1)
+ return -1;
+ written += just_written;
+ }
}
g_check(p->realbuffer);