Re: Have I pushed Evolution beyond where it is designed to go?

On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 16:57 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> I simply urge people to not take these "it's horrible" statements,
> without any reference to actual problems that anyone has ever had in
> real life and very little understanding of what exactly a flatpak or
> snap is, how they are built, or how they work, as gospel.

Hi,

in 2016 I tried to build a snap for qjackctl, hence a real-time sound
server and real-time audio apps using this sound server were involved.
This time I was subscribed to
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft , in the meantime
replaced by https://forum.snapcraft.io ;). Nowadays probably some of the
old issues are solved, however, apart from security concerns, the snap
infrastructure is inappropriate for a lot of domains, while the classic
packages or ports approach is appropriate for all domains.

Regards,
Ralf

_______________________________________________
evolution-list mailing list
[email protected]
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list