Re: Hidden agendas and Soft Targets [Was: Re: Warning fixes]

On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 20:19 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 12:15 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> 
> > I had/still have the impression that Jeffrey was going to commit it to
> > that branch after he made his personal corrections to it? If not, I can
> > definitely commit my own patch to it. I was told to wait for what
> > Jeffrey was going to commit ...
> 
> Harish,
> 
> I still don't have a decision from you on this one.
> 

Philip,

 I do not have any context on what you/fejj/varadhan agreed upon
regarding the patches or the corrections.  I have merely facilitated the
process by creating the branch.  Without knowing more, it would be
incorrect for me to make a call on committing the patch [See (1)].
This remains the prerogative of Varadhan, who maintains the Camel
module.



> > I was told to wait for what Jeffrey was going to commit ...
What/Who are you waiting for ? 
> Who is going to commit what on this branch?



> ps. I created a tracker bug for the mmap work:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364766
> 
Thanks for the handle. Added myself to the CC list. 

(1) You have marked the patch as 'needs work'  citing gaps in meta-data
support and impact on other camel providers like evolution-brutus. This
suggests a long review<->rework cycle - so I leave it to the
submitter/reviewers to decide if they want to do this on the CVS
immediately or after some time.

Varadhan should be back in office in a day or two - you can take it
forward together then on.


Regards,
Harish