Re: Code of Conduct Adoption Process

Nuritzi Sanchez <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.foundation.general
Message-ID <CAKzqScR=6BTxkayOooVRR9HY+3vrrh6xOULUL+Uib+79DKjctQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Lefty,

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Lefty <[email protected]> wrote:

> My constructive criticism is that you not take your code of conduct
> guidance from people who are unrepentant poster children for the need for a
> code of conduct.
>
> http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/EMACS_virgins_joke
>

We're all here to learn from the past. Since drafting a CoC can become an
emotionally charged subject very quickly, we need to make sure not to make
things personal.

I appreciate your sensitivity to a past issue that caused a lot of
controversy, so thanks for sending that link. It's a great example for us
to consider when drafting the CoC, so that we dissect the issue and think
about how we might craft a policy that can help us avoid similar fall outs
in the future.

Both have been added to our resource list
<https://wiki.gnome.org/eventCoCresources>. Thanks again!



> On Sep 15, 2016, at 9:32 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>
> Hi Lefty,
>
> We want to keep this productive and constructive. Please feel free to
> email us any specific language that you think we should stay away from and
> why, or any resources you think are a good example of a CoC.
>
> Remember, we want both examples of CoCs that you don't think work, and
> ones you think do. The important part is to explain why.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Best,
> Nuritzi
>
> ..............................................................
>
> *Nuritzi Sanchez*  |  +1. <+1.650.218.7388>650.218.7388 <+1.650.218.7388>
>  |  Endless <http://endlessm.com/>
>
> On Sep 14, 2016, at 1:18 PM, Lefty <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I'm unconvinced that people should be taking their conduct tips from
> "Beloved Saint IGNUtious" and the Shrine of the EMACS Virgins..,
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Sep 14, 2016, at 10:35 AM, Richard Stallman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Here's a code that I helped write:
>
> http://abstractions.io/policies/#code-of-conduct .
>
>
> I tried to avoid vague, subjective rules
>
> that could be interpreted in many ways.
>
>
> --
>
> Dr Richard Stallman
>
> President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
>
> Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
>
> Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> foundation-list mailing list
>
> [email protected]
>
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> coc-working-group-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/coc-working-group-list
>
>


-- 

............................................................
.................

*Nuritzi Sanchez*  |  +1.650.218.7388 |  Endless <http://endlessm.com/>


[image: --]

Nuritzi Sanchez
[image: https://]about.me/nuritzi
<https://about.me/nuritzi?promo=email_sig>

_______________________________________________
foundation-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.