Re: Proposal for an Events Code of Conduct and Policy Referendum

Benjamin Berg <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.foundation.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 19:09 -0700, Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
> We discussed the topic of Events Code of Conduct during today's board
> meeting.
> 
> The board intends to consider your motion separately from the Code of
> Conduct that was proposed by the working group; we will soon proceed
> to seek membership consultation on the working group proposal.

I think my stance is quite clear. As Allan stated quite literally, he
continued working on the Draft without including the rest of the WG in
this work. Regardless of whether Allan was acting as a board member or
chairman of the WG, he has overstepped his authority by doing so. As
such, I do not consider the current documents to be a legitimate
proposal from the WG that the board could even start to consider.

I do not think that this is just a technicality that can be taken
lightly. Should the Board continue to discuss the proposal as is, it
would legitimise the misconduct of some CoC WG members.

In contrast, my proposal for an open referendum allows the draft to be
resubmitted therefore avoiding the above taints.


> As per the section 7.10 of the Bylaws of the GNOME Foundation [1], it
> is your right as a member to propose a referendum if you can gather
> support from at least 10% of the membership.

Thanks for the short summary of the how a Referendum works when
initiated by a community member.

Benjamin

> Since such process should overall be carried out by the Membership
> and Election committee, I suggest that you get in touch with them for
> next steps, but as this would be a novel process for most of us,
> please let us know if you feel that you need any more support from
> the board to exercise this right.
> 
> [1] https://www.gnome.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/bylaws.pdf
> 
> Thanks,
> Cosimo

_______________________________________________
foundation-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Lfcv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.