Re: Proposal for an Events Code of Conduct and Policy Referendum

Hi Tobias,

On Sat, 2018-04-21 at 15:12 +0200, Tobias Mueller wrote:
> [SNIP]
> Am I right in assuming that you would not pursue a referendum if the
> board does not further decide on the current draft?

You are right that this would render many of my reasons to push for a
referendum (or an alternative) obsolete. However, I do not believe that
this is a feasible solution considering that there are good chunks of
the community who are strongly in favour of the Foundation regulating
events in this way.

> [SNIP]
> 
> You have another interesting mechanism at your disposal that we used in
> 2012: You can ask for amendment of the bylaws to include provisions that
> you desire, cf. Article XVII:
> https://people.gnome.org/~tobiasmue/bylaws2012/bylaws.html#amendments

While interesting, I am unsure as to how it applicable to this case.

Benjamin

_______________________________________________
foundation-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=n+gr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----