Re: Proposal for an Events Code of Conduct and Policy Referendum

Allan Day <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.foundation.general
Message-ID <CAC_wn4sY8Pma=HtjacmTCmJyPx=7UiAu1J0edKbfpiEPD7tozw@mail.gmail.com>
Alexandre Franke <[email protected]> wrote:
...
> The WG is a group working on a document that invites people involved
> in a conflict to seek assistance from a third party. Yet it seems
> that, when a conflict arised, they didn’t call for external
> arbitration, and even went as far as issuing warnings to one of the
> parties involved on their own. I find this highly disturbing.

I don't think that this is a fair or accurate summary of events within
the working group, and I'd suggest not jumping to conclusions or
making inaccurate claims without knowing the facts.

The big picture here is that the working group went to great effort to
make sure that everyone was able to participate, and that we had a
full and rigorous drafting process. Considering how much effort went
into this, a little appreciation for the work done by the working
group would be nice.

Allan
_______________________________________________
foundation-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.