Re: Proposal for an Events Code of Conduct and Policy Referendum

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.foundation.general
Message-ID <CAHbXgc1JGHacq8iKfJ0_ReTipgR-aA2Yf1qCa197AyFFkvT1mQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 8:15 AM Tobias Mueller <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2018-04-30 at 15:48 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> > The big picture here is that the working group went to great effort to
> > make sure that everyone was able to participate, and that we had a
> But it sounds like it was made sure that "everyone" was having the same
> opinion rather than allowing dissent.
>

Wow, there's really a lot of jumping to conclusions going on in this
thread, isn't there?

None of us know what went on except the participants, which as I've said
before renders this entire discussion meaningless. But, Allan did
specifically say earlier in the thread:

"Large parts of the current draft were directly influenced by Ben's
contributions, and we've expended a great deal of energy trying to
accommodate his views."

Doesn't sound like cracking down on dissent. Then again, I really have no
idea. Please, can we stop the wild speculation and preferably just end this
discussion? I don't see anything beneficial coming out of it.

Regards,
Philip C

_______________________________________________
foundation-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.