Re: Question to candidates: eco-friendliness
Benjamin Berg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.foundation.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, On Mon, 2019-06-03 at 18:10 +0100, Philip Withnall wrote: > What steps do you think the Foundation could take to reduce its > environmental impact, and the environmental impact of the project as a > whole? It is an interesting question. I really believe that this is an important issue and that we have an issue with worldwide politics either not doing enough to hold their promises or even actively undermining efforts. But, I also believe that environmental politics is outside of the scope of the GNOME Foundation. So while I personally do encourage every Foundation member to be active, I also doubt that it makes sense for the Foundation to take a strong political stance on the issue. That said, we can and probably should try to change in some regards. You mentioned travel, and an easy change we can quickly implement would be to explicitly ask everyone to offset their carbon footprint when travelling and reimbursing the additional cost for everyone who is Foundation sponsored. I also know that some organisations have started to make it mandatory to consider environmental impact in their decision making process. I expect that at least some individuals have made considerations like this when e.g. buying swag for events. That said, I do think it is perfectly reasonable and desirable for the Foundation to decide that these factors should or must be taken into account when making spending decisions. With regard to development on GNOME to e.g. support older hardware and prolong their lifetime (waste reduction), I do currently see such initiatives as normal development efforts that would be supported by the Foundation as usual. Benjamin > I’m asking in more of an organisational sense than a technical sense. > It’s up to individual maintainers to ensure their software is not > resource-hungry, etc. > > I imagine this is the kind of question where it’s easy to just say > “yes, I care about environmental friendliness”, so I suggest you might > want to reply with your ideas about things the board could do to reduce > environmental impact — whether those things are big, small, incremental > steps to reduce our physical resource usage, or fundamental changes to > how we organise the project to reduce the impact of travel. It would be > interesting to hear them all, and how feasible/practical you think any > improvements are. > > Obviously, those who have already served on the board will have some > insight to share about what the board already does, and concrete ways > it could improve; hopefully this doesn’t disadvantage those who haven’t > already served on the board. > > Ta, > Philip > _______________________________________________ > foundation-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEED2NO4vMS33W8E4AFq6ZWhpmFY3AFAlz1a5wACgkQq6ZWhpmF Y3DydhAAmNm0tfinpO41U540f3PJX/Agj+eEBK0IWkiSQJ0lFFHaiFIEYLOjQq6M gjHMKsA2lNMC2VF52i6MXTskNova7TXLTw7UhtJdqJe6HFZ0XAqVxyNSlxZ/1Di9 R0gzOTOZzb8v/hGA477fbSoprTQB6n/9IbQAJaXbdic6Cj0Htq0qd63cWV1MIR3G tGV3jMjabro2EYK3WQ+EI0MSNR50VaeKVFLNy5L2cVJQlOBaqRu14t8GKjuMlHUD RL9BZdda6wukf4hch1el2jfikD87s2dmgRQWZys+NL4UBn3v2Mli9/cklA9g84qZ 5T60CyvWBXLEhYcXUUNBSOwIfGOsAbOe2cYvHrSiiVNAJyqcl7pYvscFwaHqFlk5 8a6beuZhUjcn0/AnVDNSFi/p8u3590DrsckmIbYwH+pCwPgMEzyAR5qsdmUj1FbB ACnVG7Z6RnnMYwwtX2pknz1YHZwjdsrZLo15aclPs7NT4BE3C6LAAA14SYI698I8 ujzg12o7tYaVcJS4gWtE/lqm/EEp3QkqvBGdyKI2bTl+lW9keNyw96saPDCVDX23 wezSVDLv9y7AYEwjI3qycdDNpNCwIFSF13JxJIqkui6eXGtFj/6YPXMNXu12mfE7 JdHryU74WCfUgVjE1qgZGcYW0tz4A07SvNnOoOBV/i8N6ckaPHQ= =etmD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----