Re: Splitting the repos...
Gary Kramlich <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.gaim.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGA0GwDi_C3fx0fELffZ2cP-BGCyos632Us-A2VxxaKtRgvR7g@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Michael McConville <[email protected]> wrote: > Gary Kramlich wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Patrick Cloke <[email protected]> wrote: > > > First off I'll say that splitting this out would like making > > > building libpurple for Instantbird easier, so that'd be nice... > > > > > > It might make development harder, however. This is from my > > > experiences developing on Instantbird which has components across 3 > > > repositories: mozilla-central (UI core, networking, security, etc. > > > from Firefox), comm-central (Instantbird and Thunderbird code), > > > purplexpcom (libpurple and XPCOM interfaces to libpurple): > > > > > Nice I didn't realize there was a purple-xpcom :) Anyways, how is > > this different than how Pidgin has a ton of external dependencies? > > I'm not trying to justify it, just wondering what makes this > > different. > > External dependencies are typically just installed with a system package > manager. No source or building necessary. > That's why I have Bamboo setup to export repositories as artifacts/deploys that can be used by your system package manager. Thanks, -- Gary Kramlich <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel