Re: State of Pidgin: Reverse Engineering FUD
Gary Kramlich <[email protected]> Tue, 3 Oct 2017 10:15:11 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.gaim.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGA0GwCT7A6_WSe8pxxCgjVG=LRQEmv2XTQQZM__wz1FjB5xPg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Richard Laager <[email protected]> wrote: > If the reverse engineered PRPLs are a practical problem, then splitting > them out seems like the obvious solution. I'm skeptical about the > package websites. I think we'd be far better off shipping a tarball and > letting the normal distro packaging mechanisms take it from there. Of course the distributions can package it as well, and that's probably recommended for native plugins. But the plugin website idea is nothing new. We've had it two GSoC's. The one in 2012 was never started and I have no idea what happened in 2013. At any rate, my point is that we seem to think it's a good idea. > -- > Richard Thanks, -- Gary Kramlich <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel