Re: State of Pidgin: Attracting and Maintaining New Contributors
Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:42:30 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.gaim.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2017-10-03, 15:48 GMT, Matěj Cepl wrote: > On 2017-10-03, 14:43 GMT, Gary Kramlich wrote: >> Aside from that, I also mention (at least I have previously) >> that open source software is about providing choices, no one >> is providing a choice. Everyone is using the same tool for >> the same job creates a monopoly that stifles innovation. > > http://www.islinuxaboutchoice.com/ > > I think this is really not about the argument but just > a rationalization of status quo, but … > > I have no business of telling anything how this project is > supposed to be managed, because I really do not participate in > it, so I will let you to it. I am sorry for returning to this long dead thread, but it bothers me that I have provided here what I consider the wrong answer. I did not want to say (and I believe ajax did on that page) that choice is too costly and should be approached with caution (and I agree with it), but that the world does not seem to like the freedom of choice too much. Most technologies in the FLOSS seem to tend towards some kind of optimum, and it takes really a lot of effort to turn the tide. How many alternatives there are to bash, glibc, gcc, you preferred type of text editor? There are some, but how much you heard about ksh, elvis, XEmacs, dietlibc, µClibc, actually even *BSD systems, lately? There are some alternatives, but it takes enormous amount of neglect on the side of the primary technology (vim v. neovim) or enormous amount of effort on the side of the secondary one (gcc v clang/llvm), but the natural tendency seems clearly going towards one solution. It is not issue of “should”, but just a sociological observation of the natural development in the FLOSS technosphere. And yes, it is not very original observation (http://catb.org/~esr/writings/homesteading/homesteading/). Looking at it from this point of view, I really do not see bright future for Mercurial (perhaps Facebook can save it, but I wonder whether and when they will rather fix git or build some tooling on the top of the git to make it work for them, after all Microsoft did just that). Best, Matěj -- https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber: [email protected] GPG Finger: 3C76 A027 CA45 AD70 98B5 BC1D 7920 5802 880B C9D8 The ratio of literacy to illiteracy is a constant, but nowadays the illiterates can read. -- Alberto Moravia _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel