Pidgin 3 - Is there any point?
Eion Robb <[email protected]> Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:41:56 +1300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.gaim.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFt0mkriZ8AMUrePPGJ1EzVhYdQ4QnK=srQGu6B1sdKwANC4mQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi all, Forgive the clickbaity subject line, but I'm hoping to open some discussions. Over the past few years, there's been a few times where I've though "oh, it'd be good to send a PR to fix up XYZ issue with Pidgin2" but then my response is "well, I shouldn't do that because everything is going on in Pidgin3" and then "well, Pidgin3 is a moving target that I'm not personally using so I can't test my changes, so I better not break things for other people, so I won't make a PR" So this got me thinking..... Is there any real use for users to adopt Pidgin 3? Is there any "killer feature" that means they should want to give up on Pidgin 2 and get mass-adoption of the new and shiny, or are we just making work for the sake of work, and breaking everything in the process? Because right now, the way I see it from a user perspective is: *Pros*: Gtk3 (does this even matter?), possible pro: "v/v on windows" *Cons*: All my plugins/themes/customisations don't work So I want to ask everyone else's opinions.... Have we shot ourselves in the foot, trying to clean up the code without any actual end-user-benefit? Is Pidgin3 the next "PHP6"? Are we better off focusing our efforts on Pidgin 2 and merge in all the plugins/hacks/workarounds that people have made, to improve it? Or, do we need to release a Pidgin2 plugin loader that can load the "100 most popular plugins" for Pidgin3 to be usable and have a safe transition process? Thoughts, comments, criticisms? :) Cheers, Eion _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel