Re: using GARNOME to get a cleanly rebuilt modern GNOME library stack
"C.J. Adams-Collier" <[email protected]> Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:55:56 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.garnome |
|---|---|
| Organization | Collier Technologies |
| Message-ID | <1271116556.7239.69.camel@calcifer> |
--===============1021094980== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-G2WFWPoQfK9b1jHb/rC4" --=-G2WFWPoQfK9b1jHb/rC4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable No. Install Debian in a chroot. Run away! If you have to, garnome might work for you, but it always takes me 3 weeks or so to get a working stack. Don't get me wrong. I think garnome is great. It's just a last resort sort of great. On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 16:38 -0700, Britton Kerin wrote: > HI, >=20 > I don't want to replace my desktop, but I would like to make clean > rebuilds of glib gtk pango etc. etc. > all the way up the library stack. I'm looking at an assertion > violation in inkscape that I think may > be due to something weird in my crazy stack of gnome libs. Is garnome > a good way to go for this? >=20 > Thanks, > Britton --=-G2WFWPoQfK9b1jHb/rC4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkvDswUACgkQXKBS0hdr6UYTcgCfdvWuGB+KLWuIVLZ71p5vCGCj erAAnRY1pNeBSFliPJC3jFDpqdfTMLx4 =87EE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-G2WFWPoQfK9b1jHb/rC4-- --===============1021094980== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline -- garnome-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/garnome-list --===============1021094980==--