Re: I'd like to know an architectural decision
"Pavel Kostyuchenko" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.glade.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Tristan Van Berkom <[email protected]> wrote: > Secondly, for me to be able to provide you with more useful information, > and for me to understand you better - you must please just state your > mission with glade, you say you are encountering these problems, what > exactly are you trying to do ? http://code.google.com/soc/2008/gnome/appinfo.html?csaid=671C4A49E54095D0 And now I'm trying only to use glade in anjuta but it doesn't work well, so I think at least the most important issues should be fixed. > Agreed, I introduced the one time idle (which is IMO more stable than a timeout) > when I made glade show the first widget in a project inside the workspace at > project load time. That's good until somebody else uses idle too like Anjuta does. > The real root of this problem is that gtk+ does not support embedding > of toplevel > windows, the best way to deal with this would be to rally for support > in gtk+ and > provide patches to gtk+ to this effect, other than that there may be a > way to work > around the idle approach and make it all work synchronously, but it would also > be a hack and as they say "if its not broke dont fix it" :) And what about GtkPlug? -- Regards, Pavel _______________________________________________ Glade-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/glade-devel